Integration & automation
Integrations that replace manual data transfers.
Many processes struggle not because software is missing, but because existing tools do not communicate. A considered integration moves data reliably and makes exceptions visible.
Example: from a form to a CRM
One possible workflow: a form submission is validated and recorded as a CRM contact. A unique identifier prevents duplicate entries; failed transfers are visible and can be retried. Feasibility depends on the APIs and permissions of the systems involved.
What to check before implementation
The assessment needs the systems involved, sample data without personal information, transfer direction, and frequency. API limits, recurring vendor fees, and error handling also matter. An infrequent or inconsistent workflow may not justify automation.
Good candidates for automation
Repeated transfers between a shop, CRM, accounting, forms, or internal lists cost time and introduce errors. Automation is particularly useful for clear rules, frequent events, and information that is already digital.
- REST API and webhook integrations
- Imports, exports, and synchronization
- Notifications and status workflows
- Scheduled processing and reports
Reliable rather than invisible
An integration needs more than a successful happy path. Validation, logging, retries, useful alerts, and traceable states ensure that problems can be identified and corrected.
Credentials are protected, permissions restricted, and interfaces documented so dependencies remain understandable.
Keep using existing systems
The goal is not automatically to replace existing software. A small, well-placed connection often delivers more value by retaining proven systems and closing the gap between them.
Where is data entered twice today?
Name the systems and the manual workflow. A reliable assessment also needs a review of available interfaces, access permissions, and data volumes.
info@slaty.dev →